<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 458 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338758</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of the assessing officer, emphasizing the availability of the statutory remedy of appeals for the petitioner to address the disputed questions of fact regarding jurisdiction. The Court declined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction in the matter, highlighting the importance of following the prescribed appellate process for addressing grievances related to assessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 458 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338758</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of the assessing officer, emphasizing the availability of the statutory remedy of appeals for the petitioner to address the disputed questions of fact regarding jurisdiction. The Court declined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction in the matter, highlighting the importance of following the prescribed appellate process for addressing grievances related to assessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>