<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338748</link>
    <description>The ITAT remanded the case to the AO for re-adjudication as it found that the AO did not properly consider the assessee&#039;s explanations, earlier withdrawals, and agricultural income. The ITAT provided the assessee with an opportunity to be heard, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338748</link>
      <description>The ITAT remanded the case to the AO for re-adjudication as it found that the AO did not properly consider the assessee&#039;s explanations, earlier withdrawals, and agricultural income. The ITAT provided the assessee with an opportunity to be heard, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>