<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 435 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for further examination of documents provided by the appellant regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit on Rail and Air Travel Agents Services. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration based on the newly submitted evidence supporting the appellant&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:51:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 435 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for further examination of documents provided by the appellant regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit on Rail and Air Travel Agents Services. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration based on the newly submitted evidence supporting the appellant&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>