<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 434 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338734</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) found that the transportation related to the availed credit appeared connected to clearances of goods to the depot, qualifying as the place of removal. However, lower authorities had not adequately examined the documents. A remand was ordered for thorough verification, directing de novo adjudication within three months, allowing the appellant a personal hearing and document submission for defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:50:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 434 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338734</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) found that the transportation related to the availed credit appeared connected to clearances of goods to the depot, qualifying as the place of removal. However, lower authorities had not adequately examined the documents. A remand was ordered for thorough verification, directing de novo adjudication within three months, allowing the appellant a personal hearing and document submission for defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>