<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 433 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit for inputs used in manufacturing Wind Mill Gear Boxes cleared under both exemption and duty payment. The Tribunal emphasized the mixed nature of goods produced by the appellant and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s demand for disallowing the credit. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the cross-objection was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 433 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit for inputs used in manufacturing Wind Mill Gear Boxes cleared under both exemption and duty payment. The Tribunal emphasized the mixed nature of goods produced by the appellant and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s demand for disallowing the credit. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the cross-objection was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>