<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 431 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338731</link>
    <description>The earlier permission for provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held to survive the coming into force of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 by virtue of section 38A(c), which preserves accrued rights, obligations and liabilities unless a contrary intention appears. The prior provisional assessment could not be treated as ineffective merely because the old rules had been superseded, so refusal to finalise it on that basis was unsustainable. The record also disclosed no deliberate delay or laches by the assessee. Finalisation was therefore required under Rule 7 of the 2002 Rules, with the consequential refund and interest to follow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 431 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338731</link>
      <description>The earlier permission for provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held to survive the coming into force of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 by virtue of section 38A(c), which preserves accrued rights, obligations and liabilities unless a contrary intention appears. The prior provisional assessment could not be treated as ineffective merely because the old rules had been superseded, so refusal to finalise it on that basis was unsustainable. The record also disclosed no deliberate delay or laches by the assessee. Finalisation was therefore required under Rule 7 of the 2002 Rules, with the consequential refund and interest to follow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>