<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (4) TMI 6 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6738</link>
    <description>A removal-of-difficulty order under section 6 of the Taxation Laws (Extension to Merged States and Amendment) Act, 1949 is valid where it addresses a real impediment in applying the extended tax provisions and does not effect a substantive change in the parent Act&#039;s policy. The 1962 amendment order was treated as adjusting the working of the depreciation scheme for cases involving earlier exemption under merged-state laws or agreements, rather than as unauthorised delegated legislation. Its retrospective Explanation, operating only on pending proceedings and not closed assessments, was also regarded as a reasonable classification and therefore not contrary to article 14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (4) TMI 6 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6738</link>
      <description>A removal-of-difficulty order under section 6 of the Taxation Laws (Extension to Merged States and Amendment) Act, 1949 is valid where it addresses a real impediment in applying the extended tax provisions and does not effect a substantive change in the parent Act&#039;s policy. The 1962 amendment order was treated as adjusting the working of the depreciation scheme for cases involving earlier exemption under merged-state laws or agreements, rather than as unauthorised delegated legislation. Its retrospective Explanation, operating only on pending proceedings and not closed assessments, was also regarded as a reasonable classification and therefore not contrary to article 14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>