<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 424 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded both appeals to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of eligibility criteria and compliance with Customs Notification No. 94/96 provisions for claiming exemption benefits. The case highlights the importance of presenting evidence to support exemption eligibility and adhering to notification terms to benefit from favorable customs treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 424 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded both appeals to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of eligibility criteria and compliance with Customs Notification No. 94/96 provisions for claiming exemption benefits. The case highlights the importance of presenting evidence to support exemption eligibility and adhering to notification terms to benefit from favorable customs treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>