<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reinstated a reduced penalty of Rs. 3,00,000 on the director of the importing firm and upheld fines and penalties imposed on the importer for mis-declaration and Customs Act violations. The dispute over the nature of the importing firm was resolved, with penalties restored based on partnership status. The appeal against confiscation of goods and penalties was dismissed, affirming penalties on the importer and allowing re-export on payment of a redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reinstated a reduced penalty of Rs. 3,00,000 on the director of the importing firm and upheld fines and penalties imposed on the importer for mis-declaration and Customs Act violations. The dispute over the nature of the importing firm was resolved, with penalties restored based on partnership status. The appeal against confiscation of goods and penalties was dismissed, affirming penalties on the importer and allowing re-export on payment of a redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>