<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 421 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, rejecting the appeal due to discrepancies and lack of genuine documentation. The appellant&#039;s imported goods were confiscated, with a redemption fine of Rs. 4.00 crore imposed, and a penalty equal to the duty demanded was also imposed. The judgment highlighted the significance of authentic and accurate documentation in customs assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:42:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 421 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, rejecting the appeal due to discrepancies and lack of genuine documentation. The appellant&#039;s imported goods were confiscated, with a redemption fine of Rs. 4.00 crore imposed, and a penalty equal to the duty demanded was also imposed. The judgment highlighted the significance of authentic and accurate documentation in customs assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>