<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 419 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338719</link>
    <description>The court set aside the notice proposing tax and penalty under the Central Sales Act, 1956 and Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, finding it to be premeditated and premature. The respondent was given the liberty to issue a fresh notice in compliance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 419 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338719</link>
      <description>The court set aside the notice proposing tax and penalty under the Central Sales Act, 1956 and Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, finding it to be premeditated and premature. The respondent was given the liberty to issue a fresh notice in compliance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>