https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190231 The appellant successfully appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs due to allegations of invoices issued without goods supplied. The court found that the Revenue lacked corroborative evidence to prove the actual supply of goods to the appellant, solely relying on statements from the first stage dealer and transporter. As a result, the denial of Cenvat credit was deemed unjustified, and the appellant's claim was upheld, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals with consequential relief if any. en-us Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190231 The appellant successfully appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs due to allegations of invoices issued without goods supplied. The court found that the Revenue lacked corroborative evidence to prove the actual supply of goods to the appellant, solely relying on statements from the first stage dealer and transporter. As a result, the denial of Cenvat credit was deemed unjustified, and the appellant's claim was upheld, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals with consequential relief if any. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190231