<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1092 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the rejection of their refund claim based on unjust enrichment was incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory provisions and precedents supporting the appellants&#039; position, ultimately granting relief and allowing the appeal. The decision highlighted the inapplicability of unjust enrichment in this case due to the specific legal framework and timeline involved, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1092 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the rejection of their refund claim based on unjust enrichment was incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory provisions and precedents supporting the appellants&#039; position, ultimately granting relief and allowing the appeal. The decision highlighted the inapplicability of unjust enrichment in this case due to the specific legal framework and timeline involved, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>