<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1188 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190237</link>
    <description>For SSI exemption eligibility, exempted clearances, including sprinkler irrigation systems and related cleared goods forming part of the system, were required to be included in aggregate turnover where the governing circular and Board clarification so provided. The contrary contention that such clearances were excludable from the turnover limit was rejected, and the inclusion of those clearances in the eligibility computation was upheld. The extended period of limitation was also sustained because the assessee continued its own turnover method despite the clarification, and the demand rested on investigation and private records. On that basis, the demand and penalty were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1188 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190237</link>
      <description>For SSI exemption eligibility, exempted clearances, including sprinkler irrigation systems and related cleared goods forming part of the system, were required to be included in aggregate turnover where the governing circular and Board clarification so provided. The contrary contention that such clearances were excludable from the turnover limit was rejected, and the inclusion of those clearances in the eligibility computation was upheld. The extended period of limitation was also sustained because the assessee continued its own turnover method despite the clarification, and the demand rested on investigation and private records. On that basis, the demand and penalty were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>