<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1163 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, allowing the appeal and granting relief to the appellants. The decision emphasized that refund is permissible when credit adjustment is not feasible, contrary to the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; interpretation. The judgment clarified the correct application of Rule 5 and the conditions for refund eligibility, citing relevant precedents and ensuring compliance with legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1163 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, allowing the appeal and granting relief to the appellants. The decision emphasized that refund is permissible when credit adjustment is not feasible, contrary to the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; interpretation. The judgment clarified the correct application of Rule 5 and the conditions for refund eligibility, citing relevant precedents and ensuring compliance with legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>