<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190259</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit on excess duty paid by the supplier. The court held that the appellant was entitled to take credit on duty paid by the supplier as per the proviso to Rule 3 of the Central Excise Rules. The appellant had correctly availed the Cenvat credit, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any necessary consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190259</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit on excess duty paid by the supplier. The court held that the appellant was entitled to take credit on duty paid by the supplier as per the proviso to Rule 3 of the Central Excise Rules. The appellant had correctly availed the Cenvat credit, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any necessary consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>