https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190255 The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi due to defective authorization under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The authorization for filing the appeals on behalf of the Committee was signed by only one Commissioner instead of the required two, rendering them non-maintainable. The appeals, related to an Order-in-Original passed by the Addl. Commissioner, Central Excise, Lucknow, were challenged by M/s. A.T.V. Project (I) Ltd. The Tribunal found the authorization deficient and dismissed the appeals on this basis. en-us Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190255 The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi due to defective authorization under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The authorization for filing the appeals on behalf of the Committee was signed by only one Commissioner instead of the required two, rendering them non-maintainable. The appeals, related to an Order-in-Original passed by the Addl. Commissioner, Central Excise, Lucknow, were challenged by M/s. A.T.V. Project (I) Ltd. The Tribunal found the authorization deficient and dismissed the appeals on this basis. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190255