<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1319 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190257</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s denial of the Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption notification due to brand name usage was overturned. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing ownership structure and brand name usage precedent. The Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court upheld the decision, clarifying brand name interpretation for exemption eligibility and ownership structures in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1319 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190257</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s denial of the Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption notification due to brand name usage was overturned. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing ownership structure and brand name usage precedent. The Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court upheld the decision, clarifying brand name interpretation for exemption eligibility and ownership structures in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>