<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1218 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190264</link>
    <description>For DTA clearances by a 100% EOU, assessable value is determined by the domestic transaction value under the valuation rules, not by the FOB export value of the same goods. The analysis notes that the earlier departmental circular supporting export-price-based valuation had been displaced by later Tribunal decisions and withdrawn by the Board, while the applicable circular allowed acceptance of transaction value if it satisfied the valuation rule. In the absence of evidence that the declared domestic sale price was below contemporaneous import prices of similar goods, the demand, interest, and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1218 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190264</link>
      <description>For DTA clearances by a 100% EOU, assessable value is determined by the domestic transaction value under the valuation rules, not by the FOB export value of the same goods. The analysis notes that the earlier departmental circular supporting export-price-based valuation had been displaced by later Tribunal decisions and withdrawn by the Board, while the applicable circular allowed acceptance of transaction value if it satisfied the valuation rule. In the absence of evidence that the declared domestic sale price was below contemporaneous import prices of similar goods, the demand, interest, and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>