https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190225 The Court held that the Act applied to the lands granted to the appellant under the Government Grants Act, as the appellant fell within the definition of a holder of agricultural lands. It was determined that a fresh notice was not required after the deletion of a specific provision in the Act, and the judgment in a previous case was found inapplicable to the present scenario. Additionally, a provision from another Act was deemed irrelevant to the lease granted under the Government Grants Act. The Court dismissed the appeals without costs, upholding the authorities' actions as valid and within their jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 02 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 18:31:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190225 The Court held that the Act applied to the lands granted to the appellant under the Government Grants Act, as the appellant fell within the definition of a holder of agricultural lands. It was determined that a fresh notice was not required after the deletion of a specific provision in the Act, and the judgment in a previous case was found inapplicable to the present scenario. Additionally, a provision from another Act was deemed irrelevant to the lease granted under the Government Grants Act. The Court dismissed the appeals without costs, upholding the authorities' actions as valid and within their jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190225