<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (3) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190222</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the distress warrant for the recovery of municipal taxes, affirmed the jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes, Ahmedabad, ruled Rule 5 was not ultra vires, and clarified the applicability of the Ahmedabad City Courts Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the power to issue a distress warrant during pending standard rent determination applications, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (3) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190222</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the distress warrant for the recovery of municipal taxes, affirmed the jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes, Ahmedabad, ruled Rule 5 was not ultra vires, and clarified the applicability of the Ahmedabad City Courts Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the power to issue a distress warrant during pending standard rent determination applications, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>