<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190217</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed solely because the tax effect was below the Rs. 10 lakh threshold, and the CBDT guideline bars filing appeals in such cases. The Court applied that administrative non-filing policy and declined to examine the merits, treating the low tax effect as the only ative ground for dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 14:08:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190217</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed solely because the tax effect was below the Rs. 10 lakh threshold, and the CBDT guideline bars filing appeals in such cases. The Court applied that administrative non-filing policy and declined to examine the merits, treating the low tax effect as the only ative ground for dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>