<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 408 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 67,096 on depreciation, upholding the disallowance of Rs. 2,34,000 on professional fees, dismissing the ground on commission as infructuous, and remitting the issue of bad debts back to the AO for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:10:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 408 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 67,096 on depreciation, upholding the disallowance of Rs. 2,34,000 on professional fees, dismissing the ground on commission as infructuous, and remitting the issue of bad debts back to the AO for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>