<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 405 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the assessee adequately explained the sources for the investments and credits in question. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence over suspicion to justify income additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:05:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 405 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the assessee adequately explained the sources for the investments and credits in question. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence over suspicion to justify income additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>