<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 404 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on both issues. The deletion of the addition under Section 41(1) was justified as the liabilities had not ceased or been remitted, and the reduction of the Gross Profit rate was reasonable based on the previous year&#039;s figures. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the Commissioner&#039;s findings and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:05:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 404 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on both issues. The deletion of the addition under Section 41(1) was justified as the liabilities had not ceased or been remitted, and the reduction of the Gross Profit rate was reasonable based on the previous year&#039;s figures. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the Commissioner&#039;s findings and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>