<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 402 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338702</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decisions of the CIT(A) were upheld in a case involving disallowance of on-money for land purchase, unexplained expenditure, and disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions lacked evidence and the disallowances were unjustified. The Tribunal directed that any additions should be made in the hands of the relevant parties, not the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:05:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 402 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338702</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decisions of the CIT(A) were upheld in a case involving disallowance of on-money for land purchase, unexplained expenditure, and disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions lacked evidence and the disallowances were unjustified. The Tribunal directed that any additions should be made in the hands of the relevant parties, not the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>