<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 401 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting a deduction for bad debts amounting to Rs. 5,37,41,411, while excluding the excess provision of Rs. 1,30,23,780. The decision was based on the finding that the bad debts were written off in the debtor&#039;s accounts, fulfilling the conditions of section 36(1)(vii) despite a discrepancy in the reconciliation of the written-off amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:05:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 401 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting a deduction for bad debts amounting to Rs. 5,37,41,411, while excluding the excess provision of Rs. 1,30,23,780. The decision was based on the finding that the bad debts were written off in the debtor&#039;s accounts, fulfilling the conditions of section 36(1)(vii) despite a discrepancy in the reconciliation of the written-off amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>