<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 397 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338697</link>
    <description>The Court held that the interest/service charges paid by the investment company were allowable as a deduction under the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the expenditure was akin to a service charge and not of a capital nature, as it did not relate to the acquisition of capital. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 397 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338697</link>
      <description>The Court held that the interest/service charges paid by the investment company were allowable as a deduction under the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the expenditure was akin to a service charge and not of a capital nature, as it did not relate to the acquisition of capital. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>