https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338693 The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), Faridabad for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal found in favor of the Assessee, deleting the addition of unexplained cash deposits in the bank accounts based on a precedent case decision by ITAT, New Delhi. The Tribunal considered the issues similar to the previous case and ruled in favor of the Assessee, concluding that the grounds related to charging interest under sections 234B and 234C were consequential and did not require separate adjudication. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338693 The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), Faridabad for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal found in favor of the Assessee, deleting the addition of unexplained cash deposits in the bank accounts based on a precedent case decision by ITAT, New Delhi. The Tribunal considered the issues similar to the previous case and ruled in favor of the Assessee, concluding that the grounds related to charging interest under sections 234B and 234C were consequential and did not require separate adjudication. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338693