<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 392 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the vague and ambiguous nature of the penalty notice, which did not specify the exact charge, violating the principle of natural justice and rendering the penalty unsustainable in the eyes of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 392 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the vague and ambiguous nature of the penalty notice, which did not specify the exact charge, violating the principle of natural justice and rendering the penalty unsustainable in the eyes of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>