<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 390 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338690</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed both appeals related to the interpretation and application of Section 80IB(10)(d) of the Income Tax Act. In the case of the &#039;Brahma Majestics&#039; project for Assessment Year 2007-08, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no substantial question of law. The Court also ruled in favor of the Tribunal&#039;s determination that the Commercial Units in the project exceeded the prescribed limit, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions. Additionally, the Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the deduction under Section 80IB(1) for the &#039;Brahma Avenue&#039; project, based on factual findings and legal precedents, ultimately dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 390 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338690</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed both appeals related to the interpretation and application of Section 80IB(10)(d) of the Income Tax Act. In the case of the &#039;Brahma Majestics&#039; project for Assessment Year 2007-08, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no substantial question of law. The Court also ruled in favor of the Tribunal&#039;s determination that the Commercial Units in the project exceeded the prescribed limit, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions. Additionally, the Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the deduction under Section 80IB(1) for the &#039;Brahma Avenue&#039; project, based on factual findings and legal precedents, ultimately dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>