<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declared the impugned order null and void due to procedural irregularities and lack of legal authority, relieving the appellant from adverse effects. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and adherence to legal principles in adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declared the impugned order null and void due to procedural irregularities and lack of legal authority, relieving the appellant from adverse effects. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and adherence to legal principles in adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>