https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338679 The appeal was dismissed as the appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on service tax paid for periods 2002-03 and 2005-06 in April 2007 was found ineligible under Rule 3(i) and Rule 11 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Member (Judicial) held that credit was only permissible for services received after 10-9-2004, and transitional provisions did not apply to services provided before that date. The decision was based on the clear provisions of the rules and previous judgments supporting the department's disallowance of the credit. en-us Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338679 The appeal was dismissed as the appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on service tax paid for periods 2002-03 and 2005-06 in April 2007 was found ineligible under Rule 3(i) and Rule 11 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Member (Judicial) held that credit was only permissible for services received after 10-9-2004, and transitional provisions did not apply to services provided before that date. The decision was based on the clear provisions of the rules and previous judgments supporting the department's disallowance of the credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338679