<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338670</link>
    <description>Customs classification of imported goods is not conclusive for Central Excise purposes; excise classification must be determined independently from the actual nature of the goods and the relevant tariff entry. Where the appellate authority relies only on the import classification and does not examine the correct excise classification on merits, the matter requires reconsideration. The impugned order was set aside and the dispute remanded for fresh decision on excise classification without being influenced by the Customs assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338670</link>
      <description>Customs classification of imported goods is not conclusive for Central Excise purposes; excise classification must be determined independently from the actual nature of the goods and the relevant tariff entry. Where the appellate authority relies only on the import classification and does not examine the correct excise classification on merits, the matter requires reconsideration. The impugned order was set aside and the dispute remanded for fresh decision on excise classification without being influenced by the Customs assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>