<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338670</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the classification of imported goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant imported &#039;Solubor,&#039; initially classified under chapter 3105 by Customs but repacked and sold as fertilizer. The original authority classified the goods under chapter 2840, imposing duty for repacking. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) disagreed, stating that the initial Customs classification prevented a review by Central Excise officers. The Tribunal ruled that Customs classification does not bind Central Excise classification, emphasizing the need to determine the goods&#039; actual nature for proper classification. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338670</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the classification of imported goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant imported &#039;Solubor,&#039; initially classified under chapter 3105 by Customs but repacked and sold as fertilizer. The original authority classified the goods under chapter 2840, imposing duty for repacking. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) disagreed, stating that the initial Customs classification prevented a review by Central Excise officers. The Tribunal ruled that Customs classification does not bind Central Excise classification, emphasizing the need to determine the goods&#039; actual nature for proper classification. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>