https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338669 The Tribunal allowed the appeals and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It found merit in the appellant's argument that the turnover of M/s. Protective Board should not be combined with that of M/s. Protective Packaging Industries due to goods being produced through job work arrangements. The Tribunal directed the original authority to verify job work transactions, examine M/s. Protective Board's books of accounts, and complete adjudication within three months, granting the appellant a personal hearing and the opportunity to submit additional documents. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:54:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338669 The Tribunal allowed the appeals and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It found merit in the appellant's argument that the turnover of M/s. Protective Board should not be combined with that of M/s. Protective Packaging Industries due to goods being produced through job work arrangements. The Tribunal directed the original authority to verify job work transactions, examine M/s. Protective Board's books of accounts, and complete adjudication within three months, granting the appellant a personal hearing and the opportunity to submit additional documents. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338669