<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 355 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of goods under CTH 8419 as a &quot;Rotavapor R-220&quot; and confirmed the valuation at &amp;amp;8377; 27,09,723/-, imposing a redemption fine of &amp;amp;8377; 2,70,000/- and a penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 1 lac under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the classification, valuation, and penalties was unsuccessful, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 355 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of goods under CTH 8419 as a &quot;Rotavapor R-220&quot; and confirmed the valuation at &amp;amp;8377; 27,09,723/-, imposing a redemption fine of &amp;amp;8377; 2,70,000/- and a penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 1 lac under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the classification, valuation, and penalties was unsuccessful, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>