<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 353 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and confiscation of goods under Bills of Entry No. 429 and 218. Confiscation and penalties related to Bills of Entry No. 3054 and 2658 were upheld with revisions to redemption fines. Penalties on Shri Anil Sharma and M/s. Zulash Clearing &amp;amp; Shipping Agency were upheld, while M/s. Wockhardt Ltd.&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 353 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and confiscation of goods under Bills of Entry No. 429 and 218. Confiscation and penalties related to Bills of Entry No. 3054 and 2658 were upheld with revisions to redemption fines. Penalties on Shri Anil Sharma and M/s. Zulash Clearing &amp;amp; Shipping Agency were upheld, while M/s. Wockhardt Ltd.&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>