https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190197 The Tribunal set aside the imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 15,00,000 on M/s. Turakhia Ferromet Pvt. Ltd. The Commissioner's conclusion lacked concrete evidence as the amendment only involved a change in consignee name without affecting crucial details. The penalty of Rs. 3,00,000 on M/s. Mitusutor Shipping Agency Pvt. Ltd. was also overturned due to the lack of substantial grounds and evidentiary support for the penalties. The impugned order under Section 112(a) read with Section 30 of the Customs Act, 1962, was deemed unjustified and unwarranted, leading to the allowance of the appeals in favor of the appellants. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190197 The Tribunal set aside the imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 15,00,000 on M/s. Turakhia Ferromet Pvt. Ltd. The Commissioner's conclusion lacked concrete evidence as the amendment only involved a change in consignee name without affecting crucial details. The penalty of Rs. 3,00,000 on M/s. Mitusutor Shipping Agency Pvt. Ltd. was also overturned due to the lack of substantial grounds and evidentiary support for the penalties. The impugned order under Section 112(a) read with Section 30 of the Customs Act, 1962, was deemed unjustified and unwarranted, leading to the allowance of the appeals in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190197