<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1165 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190211</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the dismissal of the cross objection as infructuous under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act. The appellate authority was deemed unjustified in rejecting the cross objection, directing the first respondent to consider it and pass a final order within three months. The interim order dated 4.4.2016 would continue until the cross objection&#039;s resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1165 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190211</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the dismissal of the cross objection as infructuous under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act. The appellate authority was deemed unjustified in rejecting the cross objection, directing the first respondent to consider it and pass a final order within three months. The interim order dated 4.4.2016 would continue until the cross objection&#039;s resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>