<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (8) TMI 3 - ASSAM High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6717</link>
    <description>Where an assessee alone had a statutory right of appeal, the appellate authority could not, at the Department&#039;s instance, reopen factual findings that contributions to a charitable trust were actually spent for charitable purposes; the factual characterisation therefore remained undisturbed. The exemption claim was also not confined to 60% of the expenditure, because the relevant proviso restricted deduction only where the same amount had already been deducted under the Act or under the Indian Income-tax Act. In the absence of any prior deduction, no proportionate limitation could be imported into the charitable deduction, and the full amount remained admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (8) TMI 3 - ASSAM High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6717</link>
      <description>Where an assessee alone had a statutory right of appeal, the appellate authority could not, at the Department&#039;s instance, reopen factual findings that contributions to a charitable trust were actually spent for charitable purposes; the factual characterisation therefore remained undisturbed. The exemption claim was also not confined to 60% of the expenditure, because the relevant proviso restricted deduction only where the same amount had already been deducted under the Act or under the Indian Income-tax Act. In the absence of any prior deduction, no proportionate limitation could be imported into the charitable deduction, and the full amount remained admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>