<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1030 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190185</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the imported Bentonite should be classified under CTH 3802 instead of 2508. Duty was to be paid accordingly, except for one appeal where the demand was time-barred. No fines or penalties were imposed due to the classification issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:39:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1030 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190185</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the imported Bentonite should be classified under CTH 3802 instead of 2508. Duty was to be paid accordingly, except for one appeal where the demand was time-barred. No fines or penalties were imposed due to the classification issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>