<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 795 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190178</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted the civil appeal, and directed that it be tagged with the related civil appeal. No stay was granted. The text records only this procedural order and does not decide any substantive central excise issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 795 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190178</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted the civil appeal, and directed that it be tagged with the related civil appeal. No stay was granted. The text records only this procedural order and does not decide any substantive central excise issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>