<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6714</link>
    <description>An order under section 33B was held not to be vitiated by breach of natural justice where the revisional authority relied only on materials already on record and on the assessee&#039;s failure to support her own claims. The findings on assessment irregularities were based on dates, entries and other record evidence already within the assessee&#039;s knowledge, not on undisclosed material collected behind her back. The challenge based on the Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction also did not show any prejudice from denial of a fair hearing. On those facts, the requirements of audi alteram partem were satisfied and the writ challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6714</link>
      <description>An order under section 33B was held not to be vitiated by breach of natural justice where the revisional authority relied only on materials already on record and on the assessee&#039;s failure to support her own claims. The findings on assessment irregularities were based on dates, entries and other record evidence already within the assessee&#039;s knowledge, not on undisclosed material collected behind her back. The challenge based on the Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction also did not show any prejudice from denial of a fair hearing. On those facts, the requirements of audi alteram partem were satisfied and the writ challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>