<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190172</link>
    <description>A preventive detention order based on a solitary seizure was quashed because it was executed after an undue and unexplained delay. The record did not show serious or genuine efforts to secure the detenu, and his intervening appearance before customs authorities weakened the claim that he was evading arrest. The Court found that the long lapse broke the live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the preventive purpose, rendering the detention unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190172</link>
      <description>A preventive detention order based on a solitary seizure was quashed because it was executed after an undue and unexplained delay. The record did not show serious or genuine efforts to secure the detenu, and his intervening appearance before customs authorities weakened the claim that he was evading arrest. The Court found that the long lapse broke the live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the preventive purpose, rendering the detention unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>