<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338636</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the department. The court found that the provisions of Section 263 were not attracted as no income had escaped taxation, and no prejudice or loss had been caused to the revenue. The examination of the agency agreement responsibilities and government approval supported the genuineness of the commission expenses, leading to the deletion of the CIT&#039;s disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 336 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338636</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the department. The court found that the provisions of Section 263 were not attracted as no income had escaped taxation, and no prejudice or loss had been caused to the revenue. The examination of the agency agreement responsibilities and government approval supported the genuineness of the commission expenses, leading to the deletion of the CIT&#039;s disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>