<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Reduced: 300% Penalty Overturned, Minimum 100% Penalty Imposed for Tax Evasion Attempt.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33201</link>
    <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - this is not a fit case for levy of 300% penalty. Therefore, we direct the assessing officer to levy minimum penalty i.e. 100% of the income sought to be evaded and compute the penalty accordingly. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:40:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Reduced: 300% Penalty Overturned, Minimum 100% Penalty Imposed for Tax Evasion Attempt.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33201</link>
      <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - this is not a fit case for levy of 300% penalty. Therefore, we direct the assessing officer to levy minimum penalty i.e. 100% of the income sought to be evaded and compute the penalty accordingly. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:40:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>