<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 326 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 3,70,244 as an undisclosed current asset was not justified. The Tribunal held that the amount had already been included in the gross receipts and profit &amp;amp; loss account, and taxing it again would amount to double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 326 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 3,70,244 as an undisclosed current asset was not justified. The Tribunal held that the amount had already been included in the gross receipts and profit &amp;amp; loss account, and taxing it again would amount to double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>