<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 324 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the set off of unabsorbed depreciation from AY 1999-2000 against the income of AY 2008-09. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing the Gujarat High Court&#039;s ruling allowing indefinite carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation post the amendment of Section 32(2) by Finance Act, 2001.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 324 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the set off of unabsorbed depreciation from AY 1999-2000 against the income of AY 2008-09. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing the Gujarat High Court&#039;s ruling allowing indefinite carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation post the amendment of Section 32(2) by Finance Act, 2001.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>