https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338614 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant Cenvat credit on the supplementary invoice. The denial of credit was based on the supplier's duty short payment due to suppression of facts. However, as the supplier promptly rectified the duty discrepancy, the appellant was entitled to the credit. The Tribunal emphasized the transaction was on a job work basis, not involving sale-purchase, supporting the appellant's claim for Cenvat credit. en-us Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 12:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338614 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant Cenvat credit on the supplementary invoice. The denial of credit was based on the supplier's duty short payment due to suppression of facts. However, as the supplier promptly rectified the duty discrepancy, the appellant was entitled to the credit. The Tribunal emphasized the transaction was on a job work basis, not involving sale-purchase, supporting the appellant's claim for Cenvat credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338614