<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 302 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the denial of cenvat credit based on invalid documents and unauthorized consideration of unregistered premises. The judgment emphasized the importance of documents meeting requirements for credit eligibility and adherence to show cause notice allegations. The denial based on invalid documents was overturned as the documents were deemed valid invoices with necessary information. The consideration of unregistered premises beyond the scope of the show cause notice was set aside, deeming it an unsustainable ground for denial. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=457865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 302 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the denial of cenvat credit based on invalid documents and unauthorized consideration of unregistered premises. The judgment emphasized the importance of documents meeting requirements for credit eligibility and adherence to show cause notice allegations. The denial based on invalid documents was overturned as the documents were deemed valid invoices with necessary information. The consideration of unregistered premises beyond the scope of the show cause notice was set aside, deeming it an unsustainable ground for denial. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>